We have reached the final episode of our series. We have built the Staging tables, the UI, and the API.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Now, it is time to connect the final piece: The Processing Logic.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n But more importantly, it is time to look at the “Truth” of this experiment. Does an “Agentic” workflow actually work for enterprise-grade Business Central development? Or is it just a fun toy?<\/p>\n\n\n\n I tasked the Orchestrator with Phase 4: creating the The agent successfully:<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, when I tried to compile, we hit a few snags. The agent missed some This confirms a recurring theme: AI is great at the “heavy lifting” (writing 100 lines of logic), but you still need a human pilot to fix the syntax errors.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n This was the most technical hurdle of the episode. We needed a way to trigger this processing logic directly from the API.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The agent tried to add a standard Action to the API page. As we discussed in the last episode, API pages do not support standard actions.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Instead of fighting with the agent to fix it, I switched to manual mode. I wrote a Kodestykke<\/p>\n\n\n This allows us to call With the Bound Action in place, I opened Postman (well, the VS Code extension equivalent) and fired a test payload.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It works. We went from zero code to a fully functional, multi-agent constructed integration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n After five episodes of “unfiltered” coding, here is my honest conclusion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n AI is an Accelerator, Not a Replacement.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n If you treat AI as a junior developer who writes fast but needs supervision, it will change your life. If you expect it to do everything perfectly while you sleep, you will be disappointed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Thank you for following along on this journey!<\/p>\n\n\n\n1. Implementing the Logic (Phase 4 & 5)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Process Staging<\/code> codeunit. This is the brain of the operation, responsible for taking the raw data from our staging tables and converting it into a real Sales Order.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
using<\/code> statements and had a naming conflict with the codeunit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
2. The “Bound Action” Problem<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
[ServiceEnabled]<\/code> procedure directly on the API page to create a Bound Action<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n[ServiceEnabled]\nprocedure Process()\nvar\n WebShopProcessing: Codeunit "Web Shop Processing";\nbegin\n WebShopProcessing.Process(Rec);\nend;\n\n<\/pre><\/div>\n\n\n
POST ...\/webOrders(ID)\/Microsoft.NAV.Process<\/code> from an external system to trigger the business logic immediately after uploading the order.<\/p>\n\n\n\n3. Testing the End-to-End Flow<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
201 Created<\/code>)<\/li>\n\n\n\nThe Verdict: Is AI Ready for Real Work?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
OnDelete<\/code>).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n